Free Daily UPSC Mains Practice QuestionsPractice today →
Home › Subjects › History + Culture › 18th Century Successor States
Topic 94 of 166 Free

18th Century Successor States

History + Culture · Learn · Prepare · Practice · Evaluate
1

Learn the Concept

All

As the Mughal Empire disintegrated after 1707, its provinces and new powers crystallised into a patchwork of 18th-century states that dominated India before British conquest. Historians group them into three types: successor states (former Mughal provinces that became autonomous — Hyderabad, Bengal, Awadh), "new" states founded by rebels or warriors (Marathas, Sikhs, Jats, Afghans of Rohilkhand), and independent kingdoms (Mysore, the Rajputs, Travancore). Fix the significance: these states were not simply symptoms of chaos — many had vigorous administration, economies and armies — but their mutual rivalries and inability to combine allowed the English East India Company to pick them off one by one, making the 18th century the hinge between Mughal and British India.

In One Line
  • Successor states: Hyderabad (Nizam-ul-Mulk, 1724), Bengal (Murshid Quli Khan), Awadh (Saadat Khan).
  • New/warrior states: Marathas, Sikhs, Jats (Bharatpur), Rohillas (Rohilkhand).
  • Independent kingdoms: Mysore (Haidar Ali, Tipu Sultan), the Rajputs, Travancore.
  • Common features: fiscal reliance on revenue-farming (ijara), rising zamindars/bankers, European-trained armies; chronic mutual conflict.
Glossary (define-on-first-use)
  • Successor state: a former Mughal province whose governor became hereditary and autonomous while nominally loyal.
  • Ijaradari: revenue-farming — the right to collect revenue auctioned to the highest bidder (common in these states).
  • Nizam: the title of the ruler of Hyderabad (from "Nizam-ul-Mulk").
  • Nawab: a Mughal provincial governor; in Bengal/Awadh the title of the autonomous ruler.
  • Rohillas: Afghan settlers who created the state of Rohilkhand.

1. Successor states — Hyderabad, Bengal, Awadh

  • Hyderabad: Nizam-ul-Mulk Asaf Jah, Aurangzeb's able Deccan viceroy, founded an autonomous state in 1724, tolerant and well-administered, that lasted (under British paramountcy) until 1948.
  • Bengal: Murshid Quli Khan made Bengal effectively independent, reformed revenue, and encouraged trade; his successors (Alivardi Khan, Siraj-ud-Daula) ruled the richest province until Plassey (1757).
  • Awadh: Saadat Khan (Burhan-ul-Mulk) founded the Awadh state; his successors (Safdar Jung, Shuja-ud-Daula) made it prosperous until defeat at Buxar (1764) brought British control.

2. New & warrior states

  • The Marathas (the greatest; see previous leaf) and the Sikhs of Punjab (misls, later Ranjit Singh) were rising warrior powers. The Jats built a state around Bharatpur, and the Afghan Rohillas created Rohilkhand. These arose from rebellion or migration rather than Mughal office.

3. Independent kingdoms — Mysore & the Rajputs

  • Mysore rose to prominence under Haidar Ali and Tipu Sultan, who modernised the army (with French help), promoted state trade and manufacture, and fought the four Anglo-Mysore Wars; Tipu died defending Srirangapatnam in 1799.
  • The Rajput states (Jaipur, Jodhpur, Udaipur) reasserted autonomy but were weakened by internal feuds and Maratha pressure; Travancore in the far south was a strong, well-run kingdom.

4. Common features & significance

  • These states shared features: increasing reliance on revenue-farming (ijara), the rising power of zamindars, bankers and merchants, and experiments with European-style armies. But their constant mutual wars and failure to unite against the British — who exploited every rivalry through diplomacy, the Subsidiary Alliance and war — proved fatal. They mark the transition from Mughal to British India.
StateFounder/leaderFate
HyderabadNizam-ul-Mulk (1724)British ally; till 1948
BengalMurshid Quli KhanPlassey (1757)
AwadhSaadat KhanBuxar (1764); annexed 1856
MysoreHaidar Ali / Tipu SultanFell 1799
Key Facts to Remember
  • Hyderabad — Nizam-ul-Mulk Asaf Jah (1724); Bengal — Murshid Quli Khan (Plassey 1757); Awadh — Saadat Khan (Buxar 1764).
  • Mysore — Haidar Ali & Tipu Sultan; four Anglo-Mysore Wars; Tipu died 1799.
  • New/warrior states: Marathas, Sikhs, Jats (Bharatpur), Rohillas.
  • Common: ijaradari (revenue-farming), rising bankers/zamindars, European-style armies.
  • Their disunity enabled British conquest; the 18th c. = Mughal-to-British transition.
Connect the Dots
  • Decline of the Mughals: these states arose from the Mughal collapse (earlier leaf).
  • Peshwas & the Marathas; rise of the Sikhs: the great warrior powers (adjacent leaves).
  • Plassey, Buxar & Anglo-Mysore Wars: how the British absorbed these states (colonial leaves).
  • Subsidiary Alliance: the device used on Hyderabad and Awadh.
2

Prepare for the Exam — Prelims

Prelims

Tested on state↔founder↔fate, the three-fold classification, ijaradari, and the Plassey/Buxar/1799 anchors.

High-probability areas
  • Hyderabad = Nizam-ul-Mulk (1724); Bengal = Murshid Quli Khan; Awadh = Saadat Khan.
  • Mysore = Haidar Ali & Tipu; Tipu died 1799 (Srirangapatnam).
  • Classification: successor / new-warrior / independent kingdoms.
  • Ijaradari = revenue-farming; rising bankers & zamindars.
  • Jats = Bharatpur; Rohillas = Rohilkhand.
Common traps
  • Hyderabad's Nizam-ul-Mulk (1724) ≠ the later Marathas.
  • Bengal fell at Plassey (1757); Awadh's power broke at Buxar (1764).
  • Mysore was an independent kingdom, not a Mughal successor state.
  • Successor states were nominally loyal but effectively independent.
Revision tip: classify each state (successor / new / independent) and attach its founder + fate.
2

Prepare for the Exam — Mains

Mains

GS Paper I (18th-century transition). The examiner rewards assessing whether the century was one of decline or of new state-formation, and why the states failed against the British.

Likely question types
  • Classify and assess the states that emerged from the decline of the Mughals. (15)
  • 'The 18th century was not merely one of decline but of new beginnings.' Discuss. (15)
  • Why did the 18th-century states fail against the British? (10)
  • Examine the achievements of Mysore under Haidar Ali and Tipu Sultan. (10)
Dimensions to cover
  • Typology: successor/new/independent.
  • Administrative: ijaradari, bankers.
  • Military: European-style armies.
  • Failure: disunity, British diplomacy.
Value-additions
  • Cite the revisionist "new beginnings" thesis.
  • Note Tipu's modernisation and trade.
  • Link disunity to the Subsidiary Alliance.
3

How to Write the Answer

Mains
Worked example — decoding the question

"The 18th century was an age of both decline and new beginnings." Discuss. (15)
"Discuss" = weigh Mughal collapse against vigorous new states.

Introduction · ~20%
Set up the old "dark century" view versus the revisionist "new beginnings" view.
Body · ~60%
Decline: central collapse, invasions, instability. New beginnings: vigorous successor states (Hyderabad, Bengal, Awadh), Mysore's modernisation, rising bankers and regional economies. Note the fatal disunity before the British.
Conclusion · ~20%
Both: imperial decline coincided with regional dynamism — cut short by British conquest.
10-mark: ~150 words · ~7 min
15-mark: ~250 words · ~12 min
Common mistakes
  • Treating all states as mere chaos.
  • Misclassifying Mysore as a successor state.
  • Ignoring the disunity that aided the British.
Model opening line: "As the Mughal sun set, a dozen regional stars rose — bright, but fatally unwilling to shine together."
4

Prelims Questions

Prelims

30 interactive MCQs — previous-year questions are included and tagged with their year. Select an answer for instant feedback and an explanation; your score is tracked and you can review wrong answers at the end.

Practice set
Question 1 of 30
0/0
Score
5

Mains Questions

Mains

15 mains questions — previous-year questions are included and tagged. Write a full answer, then click Evaluate My Answer for paragraph-level feedback. Reveal the model structure after you attempt.

15 marks · ~250 words · ~11 min
Classify and assess the states that emerged from the decline of the Mughal Empire.
Evaluate My Answer
Model answer structure

Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.

15 marks · ~250 words · ~11 min
'The 18th century was not merely one of decline but of new beginnings.' Discuss.
Evaluate My Answer
Model answer structure

Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.

10 marks · ~150 words · ~7 min
Why did the 18th-century regional states fail against the British?
Evaluate My Answer
Model answer structure

Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.

10 marks · ~150 words · ~7 min
Examine the achievements of Mysore under Haidar Ali and Tipu Sultan.
Evaluate My Answer
Model answer structure

Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.

15 marks · ~250 words · ~11 min
Compare the successor states of Hyderabad, Bengal and Awadh.
Evaluate My Answer
Model answer structure

Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.

10 marks · ~150 words · ~7 min
Discuss the common administrative and economic features of the 18th-century states.
Evaluate My Answer
Model answer structure

Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.

10 marks · ~150 words · ~7 min
Assess the role of bankers and zamindars in the 18th-century states.
Evaluate My Answer
Model answer structure

Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.

15 marks · ~250 words · ~11 min
Trace the transition from Mughal to British India through the 18th-century states.
Evaluate My Answer
Model answer structure

Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.

10 marks · ~150 words · ~7 min
Describe the rise of the state of Bengal under its nawabs.
Evaluate My Answer
Model answer structure

Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.

10 marks · ~150 words · ~7 min
Examine the significance of revenue-farming (ijaradari) in these states.
Evaluate My Answer
Model answer structure

Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.

15 marks · ~250 words · ~11 min
To what extent were the 18th-century states viable alternatives to Mughal rule?
Evaluate My Answer
Model answer structure

Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.

10 marks · ~150 words · ~7 min
Discuss the modernisation of the army under Tipu Sultan.
Evaluate My Answer
Model answer structure

Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.

10 marks · ~150 words · ~7 min
Assess the state of Hyderabad under the Nizams.
Evaluate My Answer
Model answer structure

Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.

15 marks · ~250 words · ~11 min
How did British diplomacy and the Subsidiary Alliance exploit the disunity of these states?
Evaluate My Answer
Model answer structure

Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.

10 marks · ~150 words · ~7 min
Describe the character of the 'new' warrior states (Jats, Rohillas).
Evaluate My Answer
Model answer structure

Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.

← Peshwas & Maratha Confederacy Rise of the Sikhs →