Civil Disobedience & Round Tables
Learn the Concept
AllThe Civil Disobedience Movement (1930–34), begun with the Dandi Salt March, and the three Round Table Conferences (1930–32) dominated the national movement in the early 1930s. Fix the significance: after the Lahore Session (1929) declared Purna Swaraj (complete independence) and 26 January 1930 was observed as Independence Day, Gandhi launched Civil Disobedience by breaking the salt law at Dandi (1930) — actively disobeying unjust laws (not merely boycotting). It became a vast mass movement; the government responded with repression and with the Round Table Conferences and the Gandhi-Irwin Pact (1931). The Communal Award (1932) and the Poona Pact followed, and the movement petered out by 1934 — but it deepened mass nationalism and led toward the 1935 Act.
- Lahore Session (1929): Purna Swaraj resolution (Nehru president); 26 Jan 1930 = Independence Day.
- Dandi Salt March (Mar–Apr 1930): Gandhi's 240-mile march to break the salt law — start of Civil Disobedience.
- Round Table Conferences (1930–32): First (boycotted by Congress), Second (Gandhi attended after the Gandhi-Irwin Pact), Third (minor).
- Gandhi-Irwin Pact (1931): suspended Civil Disobedience; Congress to attend the 2nd RTC.
- Communal Award (1932) & Poona Pact: separate electorates for the Depressed Classes → replaced by reserved seats (Gandhi–Ambedkar).
- Civil disobedience: the deliberate, non-violent breaking of unjust laws (e.g. the salt law) to challenge the state.
- Purna Swaraj: complete independence, declared the goal at Lahore (1929).
- Round Table Conference: British-convened talks in London on Indian constitutional reform.
- Communal Award (1932): MacDonald's scheme giving separate electorates to minorities, including the Depressed Classes.
- Poona Pact (1932): the Gandhi–Ambedkar agreement replacing separate electorates for the Depressed Classes with reserved seats.
1. Purna Swaraj & the Dandi March
- At the Lahore Session (1929), under Jawaharlal Nehru, the Congress adopted the goal of Purna Swaraj (complete independence) and resolved to observe 26 January 1930 as Independence Day. Gandhi then launched Civil Disobedience with the famous Dandi Salt March (12 March – 6 April 1930), walking ~240 miles to make salt in defiance of the salt law — a simple, symbolic act that galvanised the nation.
2. The movement's spread
- Civil Disobedience spread nationwide: salt laws broken, foreign cloth and liquor boycotted, taxes refused, forest laws defied. Women participated in huge numbers; the North-West Frontier saw the Khudai Khidmatgars under Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan ("Frontier Gandhi"). The government responded with mass arrests and repression.
3. Round Table Conferences & the Gandhi-Irwin Pact
- The British convened the Round Table Conferences in London: the First (1930) was boycotted by the Congress; the Gandhi-Irwin Pact (March 1931) then suspended the movement and secured Congress participation in the Second RTC (1931), which Gandhi attended as the sole Congress representative but which failed over the communal question; the Third (1932) was insignificant. Civil Disobedience was resumed and finally called off by 1934.
4. Communal Award & Poona Pact
- In 1932, British PM Ramsay MacDonald announced the Communal Award, granting separate electorates to various minorities including the Depressed Classes. Gandhi fasted unto death against separate electorates for the Depressed Classes, leading to the Poona Pact (1932) with B.R. Ambedkar, which replaced separate electorates with reserved seats within the general electorate. These developments shaped the Government of India Act 1935.
| Event | Year |
|---|---|
| Lahore Session (Purna Swaraj) | 1929 |
| Dandi Salt March | 1930 |
| Gandhi-Irwin Pact | 1931 |
| Communal Award & Poona Pact | 1932 |
- Lahore (1929) = Purna Swaraj (Nehru); 26 Jan 1930 = Independence Day.
- Dandi Salt March (1930) broke the salt law — start of Civil Disobedience.
- Three Round Table Conferences (1930–32); 1st boycotted; 2nd after the Gandhi-Irwin Pact (1931).
- Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan ("Frontier Gandhi") & the Khudai Khidmatgars in the NWFP.
- Communal Award (1932) → Gandhi's fast → Poona Pact (reserved seats, with Ambedkar).
- Non-Cooperation & Khilafat: the earlier mass movement (previous leaf).
- GoI Act 1935: the reform these events shaped (earlier leaf).
- Caste & women reform: Ambedkar and the Poona Pact.
- Congress ministries & WWII: the next phase (later leaf).
Prepare for the Exam — Prelims
PrelimsTested on Lahore 1929/Purna Swaraj, Dandi (1930), the three RTCs, Gandhi-Irwin (1931), Communal Award/Poona Pact (1932).
- Lahore 1929 = Purna Swaraj (Nehru); 26 Jan 1930 = Independence Day.
- Dandi Salt March 1930 (salt law) = start of Civil Disobedience.
- 1st RTC boycotted; 2nd after Gandhi-Irwin Pact (1931); 3rd minor.
- Communal Award (MacDonald, 1932) → Poona Pact (Gandhi-Ambedkar).
- Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan = Khudai Khidmatgars (NWFP).
- Civil disobedience = breaking laws; non-cooperation = boycott (distinct).
- Poona Pact = reserved SEATS (not separate electorates) for Depressed Classes.
- Gandhi attended only the 2nd RTC.
- Purna Swaraj declared 1929, not 1930.
Prepare for the Exam — Mains
MainsGS Paper I (national movement). The examiner rewards analysing Civil Disobedience's method and spread and the communal question.
- Examine the Civil Disobedience Movement and the significance of the Salt March. (15)
- Assess the Round Table Conferences and the Gandhi-Irwin Pact. (15)
- Discuss the Communal Award and the Poona Pact. (10)
- How did Civil Disobedience differ from Non-Cooperation? (10)
- Method: law-breaking vs. boycott.
- Spread: salt, women, NWFP.
- Negotiation: RTCs, Gandhi-Irwin.
- Communal: Award & Poona Pact.
- Cite the Salt March symbolism.
- Note Ghaffar Khan & women.
- Link to the 1935 Act.
How to Write the Answer
Mains"The Salt March was a masterstroke of political symbolism." Discuss. (15)
"Discuss" = explain why salt and the march mobilised the nation.
- Confusing civil disobedience with non-cooperation.
- Saying Poona Pact kept separate electorates.
- Getting the RTC that Gandhi attended wrong.
Prelims Questions
Prelims30 interactive MCQs — previous-year questions are included and tagged with their year. Select an answer for instant feedback and an explanation; your score is tracked and you can review wrong answers at the end.
Mains Questions
Mains15 mains questions — previous-year questions are included and tagged. Write a full answer, then click Evaluate My Answer for paragraph-level feedback. Reveal the model structure after you attempt.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.