Revolutionary Organizations
Learn the Concept
AllThe revolutionary organizations of the first phase (c.1900–1920) were the secret societies and armed groups that sought to overthrow British rule through revolutionary violence, especially during and after the Swadeshi movement. Fix the significance: disillusioned with Moderate methods and inspired by the Swadeshi upsurge and world events, young nationalists in Bengal, Maharashtra, Punjab and abroad formed secret societies — the Anushilan Samiti and Jugantar (Bengal), the Abhinav Bharat (Savarkar, Maharashtra), and the overseas Ghadar Party and India House — carrying out assassinations, bomb attacks, dacoities and arms smuggling. Although crushed, they popularised the ideal of complete independence and self-sacrifice and laid a tradition continued by the later (Bhagat Singh era) revolutionaries.
- Bengal: Anushilan Samiti & Jugantar; the Alipore Bomb Case (1908, Khudiram Bose & Prafulla Chaki attacked Kingsford).
- Maharashtra: Savarkar's Abhinav Bharat; the Chapekar brothers (1897, assassinated Rand).
- Abroad: India House (London, Shyamji Krishna Varma); Madame Cama; the Ghadar Party (1913, San Francisco).
- Wartime: the Ghadar/Komagata Maru episode and the (failed) Hindu-German Conspiracy during WWI.
- Anushilan Samiti / Jugantar: the chief Bengal revolutionary secret societies.
- Abhinav Bharat: V.D. Savarkar's revolutionary society in Maharashtra.
- India House: the London centre of Indian revolutionaries (Shyamji Krishna Varma).
- Ghadar Party: the revolutionary party of Indian emigrants (1913, San Francisco), aiming at armed rebellion.
- Komagata Maru (1914): the ship of Indian migrants turned away from Canada, fuelling Ghadar militancy.
1. Revolutionaries in Bengal
- Bengal was the heart of early revolutionary activity. Secret societies — the Anushilan Samiti and Jugantar — organised young men for armed action. The famous Alipore Bomb Case (1908) followed the attempt by Khudiram Bose and Prafulla Chaki to kill the magistrate Kingsford (Aurobindo Ghosh was tried but acquitted). Revolutionaries carried out assassinations and "swadeshi dacoities" to fund the movement; Rash Behari Bose attempted to bomb Viceroy Hardinge (1912).
2. Maharashtra & the Chapekars
- In Maharashtra, inspired by Tilak's militant nationalism, the Chapekar brothers assassinated the plague officer Rand (1897). V.D. Savarkar founded the revolutionary society Abhinav Bharat and wrote on the Revolt of 1857 as the "first war of independence". Maharashtra revolutionaries linked up with the overseas networks.
3. Revolutionaries abroad
- Indian revolutionaries were active overseas: Shyamji Krishna Varma's India House in London and Madame Bhikaji Cama (who unfurled an Indian flag abroad, 1907) in Europe; and above all the Ghadar Party (1913, San Francisco), founded by Lala Har Dayal, Sohan Singh Bhakna and others among Punjabi emigrants, which published the paper Ghadar and planned an armed uprising.
4. WWI plans & significance
- During WWI the revolutionaries tried to exploit Britain's difficulty: the Komagata Maru incident (1914) radicalised emigrants, and the Ghadarites planned a mutiny in India (1915) (the Hindu-German Conspiracy), which was betrayed and crushed. Though the first phase failed militarily, it popularised the goal of complete independence, created heroes and martyrs, and built a revolutionary tradition carried forward by the HRA/HSRA of the 1920s.
| Organisation | Region | Figures |
|---|---|---|
| Anushilan Samiti / Jugantar | Bengal | Barindra Ghosh; Khudiram Bose |
| Abhinav Bharat | Maharashtra | V.D. Savarkar |
| India House | London | Shyamji Krishna Varma |
| Ghadar Party | San Francisco | Har Dayal, Sohan Singh Bhakna |
- Bengal: Anushilan Samiti & Jugantar; Alipore Bomb Case (1908) — Khudiram Bose & Prafulla Chaki (Kingsford).
- Maharashtra: Chapekar brothers (1897, Rand); Savarkar's Abhinav Bharat.
- Abroad: India House (Shyamji Krishna Varma), Madame Cama, Ghadar Party (1913).
- Komagata Maru (1914); the WWI Ghadar mutiny plan (1915) was betrayed and crushed.
- Legacy: popularised complete independence; a tradition continued by the HRA/HSRA (phase 2).
- Extremists & Swadeshi: the upsurge that inspired the revolutionaries (earlier leaf).
- Revolutionary movement — phase 2: the later (Bhagat Singh era) groups (earlier leaf).
- Working class/left: some revolutionaries later turned socialist.
- Press & education: revolutionary journals (Ghadar, Yugantar).
Prepare for the Exam — Prelims
PrelimsTested on organisation↔region↔figure, Alipore (1908), Chapekars (1897), Ghadar Party (1913), and Komagata Maru (1914).
- Bengal = Anushilan Samiti & Jugantar; Alipore Bomb Case (1908).
- Khudiram Bose & Prafulla Chaki (Kingsford).
- Chapekar brothers (1897, Rand); Savarkar's Abhinav Bharat.
- India House (Shyamji Krishna Varma); Madame Cama.
- Ghadar Party (1913, San Francisco); Komagata Maru (1914).
- Ghadar Party founded 1913 at San Francisco (Har Dayal, Sohan Singh Bhakna).
- Alipore Bomb Case = 1908 (Aurobindo tried, acquitted).
- Abhinav Bharat = Savarkar (Maharashtra).
- Phase 1 (1900–20) revolutionaries differ from HRA/HSRA (phase 2).
Prepare for the Exam — Mains
MainsGS Paper I (national movement). The examiner rewards assessing the first-phase revolutionaries and distinguishing them from the later phase.
- Assess the first phase of the revolutionary movement (1900–20). (15)
- Discuss the role of revolutionaries abroad and the Ghadar Party. (15)
- Examine the revolutionary activity in Bengal. (10)
- Why did the early revolutionary movement fail? (10)
- Regional: Bengal, Maharashtra.
- Overseas: India House, Ghadar.
- Methods: assassination, arms.
- Legacy: ideal of independence.
- Cite Alipore & Komagata Maru.
- Note Savarkar & Madame Cama.
- Link to the HRA/HSRA phase 2.
How to Write the Answer
Mains"The early revolutionaries failed militarily but succeeded in inspiration." Discuss. (15)
"Discuss" = weigh their defeats against their inspirational legacy.
- Confusing phase 1 and phase 2 groups.
- Misdating the Ghadar Party.
- Ignoring the overseas networks.
Prelims Questions
Prelims30 interactive MCQs — previous-year questions are included and tagged with their year. Select an answer for instant feedback and an explanation; your score is tracked and you can review wrong answers at the end.
Mains Questions
Mains15 mains questions — previous-year questions are included and tagged. Write a full answer, then click Evaluate My Answer for paragraph-level feedback. Reveal the model structure after you attempt.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.
Intro: define the key term and give a one-line context hook.
Body 1: conceptual / historical basis with a named fact, date or example.
Body 2: evidence and analysis — sites, inscriptions, coins, archaeologists.
Body 3: limitations or the counter-view (balanced).
Conclusion: a specific, reasoned judgment / way forward.